Speak To An Expert
Get clear, personalised advice for your situation.
Jot down a few questions to make the most of your conversation.
What unfair redundancy selection means
Redundancy is only fair if the employer uses a genuine selection process and applies it consistently. In the UK, employees may have a claim if they were selected for redundancy for an unfair reason, or if the process was not carried out properly.
Unfair selection can happen where the employer targets a person because of pregnancy, maternity leave, disability, union activity, whistleblowing, part-time status, age, or another protected reason. It can also arise if the selection criteria were vague, biased, or not properly checked against evidence.
Evidence that supports a claim
The most useful evidence is anything showing how the employer decided who should be made redundant. This may include redundancy letters, scoring sheets, selection criteria, meeting notes, consultation documents, emails, and the organisation chart.
If you were scored against other staff, ask for the marks given and the reasons behind them. A claim may be stronger if the scores were inconsistent, based on opinion rather than facts, or if the employer failed to compare employees in the correct pool.
It is also helpful to keep copies of your job description, appraisals, disciplinary records, and any positive performance reviews. These can be used to challenge a poor score or show that the employer’s explanation does not match your record.
Signs the process may have been unfair
Evidence of unfairness may include being selected after raising a complaint, taking maternity leave, requesting flexible working, or belonging to a union. Timing matters, especially if the redundancy decision followed soon after one of these events.
It can also help to show that the employer did not consult properly, did not offer suitable alternative roles, or used a selection pool that excluded other employees in the same type of work. If others with similar roles were not considered, that may be relevant evidence.
In some cases, the employer may change its reasons for redundancy over time. If the explanation shifts, or if documents do not match what managers told you, that can support a challenge to the fairness of the selection.
How to collect and use the evidence
Keep a clear timeline of events, including meetings, emails, and key decisions. Save copies of all documents and write down what was said in conversations as soon as possible afterwards.
You can ask your employer for information about the redundancy process, including scoring and consultation records. In a tribunal claim, disclosure may reveal further documents that show how the decision was made.
If you think your selection was unfair, get advice quickly because strict time limits apply in the UK. An employment solicitor, trade union representative, or ACAS can help you assess the evidence and next steps.
Frequently Asked Questions
Useful evidence includes the redundancy selection criteria, scoring sheets, notes from meetings, job descriptions, performance reviews, attendance records, consultation letters, emails, and any comparison with how other employees were treated.
You should gather the scoring matrix, individual scores, assessor comments, previous appraisal records, witness statements, and any examples showing the criteria were applied inconsistently or subjectively.
Evidence can include your protected characteristic, the selection criteria, your scores, comparator information, emails, remarks, patterns of treatment, and any documents showing that a protected characteristic may have influenced the decision.
Keep consultation invitations, notes, proposal documents, timeline records, questions you asked, employer responses, alternative proposals, and any evidence showing the consultation was too short, incomplete, or not genuine.
Collect the original and revised criteria, dated documents, emails explaining the changes, scoring records before and after the change, and any evidence showing the change disadvantaged you.
You need the selection pool explanation, organisational charts, job descriptions, team structures, and evidence showing other comparable employees should have been included in the pool.
Useful evidence includes absence records, sickness policies, disability-related absence notes, medical evidence if relevant, and proof that absences were treated inconsistently or unlawfully.
Gather appraisal reports, objective performance data, targets, feedback, improvement plans, prior warnings, and evidence that the performance data used was inaccurate or selectively applied.
Keep the redundancy notice, consultation documents, meeting notes, emails, and evidence that decisions were already made before consultation took place or that your views were ignored.
Evidence may include advertisements for similar roles, replacement hires, internal messages, business records, restructuring documents, and proof that your role still existed after the redundancy.
Collect vacancy lists, job descriptions, applications, interview invitations, internal emails, and evidence showing you were qualified for a suitable alternative role but were not fairly considered.
You should compare your scoring, duties, qualifications, and treatment with similarly situated colleagues, using selection sheets, appraisal records, and witness evidence where possible.
Keep your written requests for an explanation, the employer’s responses, any data subject access request materials, and records showing the employer failed to provide a proper breakdown of your scores.
Useful evidence includes the policy, selection criteria, communications, meeting notes, scoring forms, and any gaps or contradictions showing the process was hidden, unclear, or changed without notice.
Gather evidence of your earlier complaint or protected act, the timing of the redundancy selection, emails, witness statements, and any documents suggesting you were targeted because you raised concerns.
You should keep records of union membership or activity, consultation documents, emails, witness statements, and evidence that union involvement affected your scoring or selection.
Provide emails or letters where you raised concerns, the employer’s replies, copies of the inaccurate records, and evidence showing the employer knew about the errors but did not correct them.
A tribunal claim is supported by the selection criteria, scoring documents, consultation papers, pay and appraisal records, relevant emails, witness statements, and a clear timeline of events.
You should request all documents relating to the selection process, including scoring sheets, notes, policies, emails, comparator information, and records explaining how the final decision was made.
Collect every document showing how the process worked, including the business rationale, consultation records, criteria, scoring, appeals, and evidence of inconsistencies, errors, or unfair treatment throughout.
Ergsy Search Results
This website offers general information and is not a substitute for professional advice.
Always seek guidance from qualified professionals.
If you have any medical concerns or need urgent help, contact a healthcare professional or emergency services immediately.
Some of this content was generated with AI assistance. We've done our best to keep it accurate, helpful, and human-friendly.
- Ergsy carefully checks the information in the videos we provide here.
- Videos shown by Youtube after a video has completed, have NOT been reviewed by ERGSY.
- To view, click the arrow in centre of video.
- Most of the videos you find here will have subtitles and/or closed captions available.
- You may need to turn these on, and choose your preferred language.
- Go to the video you'd like to watch.
- If closed captions (CC) are available, settings will be visible on the bottom right of the video player.
- To turn on Captions, click settings.
- To turn off Captions, click settings again.