Skip to main content

How do attorneys make decisions if there's more than one?

How do attorneys make decisions if there's more than one?

Speak To An Expert

Get clear, personalised advice for your situation.

Jot down a few questions to make the most of your conversation.


Who has the final say?

When more than one attorney is appointed, the first question is who can make decisions alone. In the UK, this depends on the wording of the lasting power of attorney or enduring power of attorney. Some attorneys must act jointly, while others can act jointly and severally.

If attorneys must act jointly, they usually all have to agree before a decision is made. If they can act jointly and severally, each attorney may make decisions on their own. The document setting out the appointment is the key place to check.

Joint and joint and several decision-making

Joint decision-making means attorneys work together and reach the same view. This can be useful for major matters, because it gives more than one person a say. However, it can also be slower if the attorneys do not agree easily.

Joint and several authority is more flexible. One attorney may deal with day-to-day issues, such as paying bills or arranging care, without waiting for the others. The attorneys should still keep each other informed and act in the donor’s best interests.

How disagreements are handled

If attorneys cannot agree, they should first try to resolve the issue by discussing the donor’s wishes, values, and current needs. The law expects attorneys to act in the donor’s best interests, not their own preferences. Good records can help show how a decision was reached.

Where the disagreement is serious, the attorneys may need legal advice or guidance from the Office of the Public Guardian. In some cases, the Court of Protection may be asked to decide. This is especially important if the dispute affects health, welfare, or large financial decisions.

Making decisions in practice

Attorneys should think about the donor’s past and present wishes, beliefs, and circumstances. They should consider medical advice, financial information, and any relevant family views. The goal is to make the choice that best supports the donor’s overall welfare.

It is also sensible to keep clear written notes. These should explain what was decided, why it was chosen, and who was involved. That helps show the decision was made properly if anyone later asks questions.

Why the wording matters

The authority given to multiple attorneys is not the same in every case. Small wording differences in the power of attorney can change who can act, when they can act, and whether agreement is needed. This is why the document should be read carefully before any decision is made.

If there is uncertainty, professional advice can prevent mistakes. A solicitor or specialist adviser can help interpret the document and explain the safest way forward. That can protect both the donor and the attorneys.

Frequently Asked Questions

Attorneys decision-making when more than one attorney appointed refers to the rules that determine how multiple attorneys act for the same person, including whether they must decide jointly, may act jointly and severally, or must follow a specific priority order set out in the appointment.

If the appointment document does not specify how multiple attorneys should make decisions, the governing law or default rules usually decide whether they must act jointly, can act independently, or must use another prescribed method.

Yes, attorneys decision-making when more than one attorney appointed can require unanimous agreement if the appointment document or applicable law says so, meaning no attorney can proceed unless all required attorneys agree.

Yes, attorneys decision-making when more than one attorney appointed may allow majority rule if the appointment document expressly permits it or if the relevant legal framework recognizes that method for the specific type of appointment.

Yes, attorneys decision-making when more than one attorney appointed can permit independent action if the appointment states that attorneys may act jointly and severally, or if the law allows each attorney to make decisions separately.

If the attorneys disagree, the result depends on the decision-making rule that applies. They may need to reach agreement, seek court or tribunal directions, follow a deadlock-breaking clause, or refrain from acting until the disagreement is resolved.

Final authority in attorneys decision-making when more than one attorney appointed depends on the appointment terms and the law. In some cases the attorneys must agree together; in others one attorney may have authority to act alone or a named lead attorney may have final say.

Attorneys decision-making when more than one attorney appointed can affect financial decisions by requiring joint approval for withdrawals, investments, bill payments, or property transactions, unless the appointment allows separate action by each attorney.

Attorneys decision-making when more than one attorney appointed can require the attorneys to consult each other before making health care decisions, and the specific rules may determine whether unanimous agreement, majority agreement, or independent action is allowed.

Yes, attorneys decision-making when more than one attorney appointed can sometimes be changed by amending the appointment, creating a new appointment, or using a legal process that updates the decision-making rules, subject to the applicable law.

The main risks include delay, deadlock, inconsistent decisions, confusion about authority, and disputes between attorneys. Clear instructions in the appointment document can reduce these risks.

It can be drafted to avoid conflict by clearly stating whether attorneys must act jointly, jointly and severally, by majority, or in a named order, and by providing a process for resolving disagreements.

Not always. Attorneys decision-making when more than one attorney appointed may require consultation in some arrangements, while others allow an attorney to act without consulting the others if the appointment expressly permits that.

Yes, attorneys decision-making when more than one attorney appointed can allocate different powers among attorneys, such as one attorney handling finances and another handling personal care, if the appointment document and law allow that structure.

If one attorney resigns or becomes unable to act, attorneys decision-making when more than one attorney appointed may continue with the remaining attorneys if the appointment and law allow it, but some arrangements may require a replacement or invalidate joint decision-making.

Yes, third parties can often rely on attorneys decision-making when more than one attorney appointed if the attorneys appear to have authority under the appointment and are acting within the permitted decision-making structure.

When a deadline is urgent, attorneys decision-making when more than one attorney appointed depends on whether urgent action can be taken by one attorney, whether a joint decision is still required, and whether the law provides any emergency flexibility.

Evidence may include the appointment document, any amendment or power of attorney instrument, records showing agreement among attorneys, signatures, emails, meeting notes, and documents demonstrating that the attorneys acted within their authority.

No, attorneys decision-making when more than one attorney appointed can vary depending on the type of document, the jurisdiction, and the powers granted, so the same rule may not apply to property, medical, or personal matters.

Someone can get advice about attorneys decision-making when more than one attorney appointed from a qualified lawyer, notary, estate planner, or the government office that oversees the relevant appointment process in their jurisdiction.

Useful Links

Important Information On Using This Service


This website offers general information and is not a substitute for professional advice. Always seek guidance from qualified professionals. If you have any medical concerns or need urgent help, contact a healthcare professional or emergency services immediately.

Some of this content was generated with AI assistance. We've done our best to keep it accurate, helpful, and human-friendly.

  • Ergsy carefully checks the information in the videos we provide here.
  • Videos shown by Youtube after a video has completed, have NOT been reviewed by ERGSY.
  • To view, click the arrow in centre of video.
Using Subtitles and Closed Captions
  • Most of the videos you find here will have subtitles and/or closed captions available.
  • You may need to turn these on, and choose your preferred language.
Turn Captions On or Off
  • Go to the video you'd like to watch.
  • If closed captions (CC) are available, settings will be visible on the bottom right of the video player.
  • To turn on Captions, click settings.
  • To turn off Captions, click settings again.